<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Thoughts about        Nothing*com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com</link>
	<description>A blog that claims to have nothing figured out.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:29:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3253</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3253</guid>
		<description>I like this topic. I would rather keep things in the open personally, but I know lots wouldn&#039;t care. I think about if my wife found out, would she care. It definitely depends on conversation and the person. If I was DMing an ex girlfriend, probably not so cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this topic. I would rather keep things in the open personally, but I know lots wouldn&#39;t care. I think about if my wife found out, would she care. It definitely depends on conversation and the person. If I was DMing an ex girlfriend, probably not so cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by @kylelreed</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator>@kylelreed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3250</guid>
		<description>That is the exact thing I am talking about, the one spouse having a presence online and the other has no clue what online presence even means.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had this issue when I was a teacher at a high school. Within the first week of me working there I got over 100 facebook request and it just continued. I accepted the request but then had to go back and defriend everyone because it could be taken as wrong and I was told to by some fellow teachers and friends. It can be dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the exact thing I am talking about, the one spouse having a presence online and the other has no clue what online presence even means.</p>
<p>I had this issue when I was a teacher at a high school. Within the first week of me working there I got over 100 facebook request and it just continued. I accepted the request but then had to go back and defriend everyone because it could be taken as wrong and I was told to by some fellow teachers and friends. It can be dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by @kylelreed</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>@kylelreed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>Well that is nice to know that you think I am smart, one of two aint bad (in regards to the banner)&lt;br&gt;You said your daughter is 23 right, seems like us 23 year old yungens got something going for us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I do not know what is up with you being the only women to comment on this. Lets change that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that is nice to know that you think I am smart, one of two aint bad (in regards to the banner)<br />You said your daughter is 23 right, seems like us 23 year old yungens got something going for us.</p>
<p>And I do not know what is up with you being the only women to comment on this. Lets change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Josh </title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3249</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3249</guid>
		<description>Great topic to bring up, I believe.  I&#039;ve not personally had any issues on Twitter, other than the occasional &quot;check out my new pics&quot; followers that I immediately block.  I&#039;ve never had any DM issues.  Perhaps my lack of Twitter popularity has something to do with that... :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me, Facebook provides issues.  I work at a treatment center where patient confidentiality is highly regarded.  I get requests, chats, private messages all the time from former patients.  I love to hear about how they&#039;re doing, but due to our privacy policy I cannot respond.  I accept their friend requests in order that they know I haven&#039;t forgotten about them, but it does make for some tedious privacy settings work on FB.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yes, I think the potential is huge for inappropriate relationships.  Imagine the amount of married couples where only one person has an online presence, with the spouse not having anything to do with Facebook, Twitter, etc.  I think it creates a new curtain to hide behind, just like chat rooms of old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great topic to bring up, I believe.  I&#39;ve not personally had any issues on Twitter, other than the occasional &#8220;check out my new pics&#8221; followers that I immediately block.  I&#39;ve never had any DM issues.  Perhaps my lack of Twitter popularity has something to do with that&#8230; <img src='http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>For me, Facebook provides issues.  I work at a treatment center where patient confidentiality is highly regarded.  I get requests, chats, private messages all the time from former patients.  I love to hear about how they&#39;re doing, but due to our privacy policy I cannot respond.  I accept their friend requests in order that they know I haven&#39;t forgotten about them, but it does make for some tedious privacy settings work on FB.  </p>
<p>But yes, I think the potential is huge for inappropriate relationships.  Imagine the amount of married couples where only one person has an online presence, with the spouse not having anything to do with Facebook, Twitter, etc.  I think it creates a new curtain to hide behind, just like chat rooms of old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Shellie Kubicki</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>Shellie Kubicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>First of all, why are all the comments so far from men? What&#039;s up with that!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny, I have wondered the same thing, to an extent. Twitter has opened up a world of &quot;friends&quot; I don&#039;t know how I survived without! Seriously. When I sent out a prayer request last night, the response was overwhelming. Seriously. Same with my daughter&#039;s set of tweeps. I stand amazed. And humbled. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are always people who are going to ruin the experience, but I choose to not let them invade my space by protecting my tweets. There is an unfortunate side of the public timeline that if I&#039;m not followed back people won&#039;t see my tweet. Most of those are the CCM artists I follow. I&#039;m ok with that. I rarely DM anyone. Had to last night. Used it for prayer requests until I could talk with my daughter first. Didn&#039;t want her finding out that way. Then she shot out a prayer request before me. My husband thinks we&#039;re both off our rockers! And I was tweeting 6 months ahead of her. She thought I was off my rocker! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really think being selective about who I follow &amp; who I let follow me back is key for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. Still not in love with your banner. I do like the pic. It is cool. And you are a pretty smart 23 year old. You so remind me of my daughter. Her spirit and compassion. Her wonderment at what life has to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, why are all the comments so far from men? What&#39;s up with that!</p>
<p>Funny, I have wondered the same thing, to an extent. Twitter has opened up a world of &#8220;friends&#8221; I don&#39;t know how I survived without! Seriously. When I sent out a prayer request last night, the response was overwhelming. Seriously. Same with my daughter&#39;s set of tweeps. I stand amazed. And humbled. </p>
<p>There are always people who are going to ruin the experience, but I choose to not let them invade my space by protecting my tweets. There is an unfortunate side of the public timeline that if I&#39;m not followed back people won&#39;t see my tweet. Most of those are the CCM artists I follow. I&#39;m ok with that. I rarely DM anyone. Had to last night. Used it for prayer requests until I could talk with my daughter first. Didn&#39;t want her finding out that way. Then she shot out a prayer request before me. My husband thinks we&#39;re both off our rockers! And I was tweeting 6 months ahead of her. She thought I was off my rocker! </p>
<p>I really think being selective about who I follow &#038; who I let follow me back is key for me.</p>
<p>P.S. Still not in love with your banner. I do like the pic. It is cool. And you are a pretty smart 23 year old. You so remind me of my daughter. Her spirit and compassion. Her wonderment at what life has to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Tom</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3246</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3246</guid>
		<description>Whether or not I&#039;ve personally (or anyone else has) noticed anything doesn&#039;t seem to matter - as a general rule, some people are going to corrupt anything they get their hands on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d say this conversation could be bumped back a few years ago to texting - now we have sexting. Before that, it was the phone after which came phone sex. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meghan and I have our own Facebook accounts, Twitter accounts, and all that jazz. I don&#039;t really think about who she&#039;s talking to or what she&#039;s doing on her computer nor does she for me. It doesn&#039;t cross my mind. Obviously, that&#039;s trust. That&#039;s how it should be. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The appropriate relations are kind of a case-by-case basis, but I personally tend to err on the side of what some others have mentioned here - it depends on context. That said, I&#039;m skeptical as to why any married dude would need to be DM&#039;ing another woman consistently (or texting, or whatever else).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know my thoughts are kinda scattered but I&#039;m short on time, but wanted to voice in a little bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not I&#39;ve personally (or anyone else has) noticed anything doesn&#39;t seem to matter &#8211; as a general rule, some people are going to corrupt anything they get their hands on. </p>
<p>I&#39;d say this conversation could be bumped back a few years ago to texting &#8211; now we have sexting. Before that, it was the phone after which came phone sex. </p>
<p>Meghan and I have our own Facebook accounts, Twitter accounts, and all that jazz. I don&#39;t really think about who she&#39;s talking to or what she&#39;s doing on her computer nor does she for me. It doesn&#39;t cross my mind. Obviously, that&#39;s trust. That&#39;s how it should be. </p>
<p>The appropriate relations are kind of a case-by-case basis, but I personally tend to err on the side of what some others have mentioned here &#8211; it depends on context. That said, I&#39;m skeptical as to why any married dude would need to be DM&#39;ing another woman consistently (or texting, or whatever else).</p>
<p>I know my thoughts are kinda scattered but I&#39;m short on time, but wanted to voice in a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Tyler Braun</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Braun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3247</guid>
		<description>I agree that it depends on the conversation. I would also say it depends on how often that type of conversation is happening and where your heart is at during it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good subject to bring up Kyle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it depends on the conversation. I would also say it depends on how often that type of conversation is happening and where your heart is at during it.</p>
<p>Good subject to bring up Kyle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Zac Cross</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>I think your @replies are more open and public and therefore innocent. I think DMs can be innocent as well, and even facebook messages vs facebook wall posts are along those same lines. However, something like Tiger Text or whatever that is, nothing good can come from that. Even facebook chat can go both directions. It comes down to trust. If your marriage/relationship has no trust, then there could be concern for who you or your spouse is communicating with. However, if you are honest with each other, there is no reason for alarm for @replying to someone or starting up conversations. I think it is far more innocent than meeting at a restaurant with a random opposite sex twitter friend for tea/coffee. That takes things to a whole new level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your @replies are more open and public and therefore innocent. I think DMs can be innocent as well, and even facebook messages vs facebook wall posts are along those same lines. However, something like Tiger Text or whatever that is, nothing good can come from that. Even facebook chat can go both directions. It comes down to trust. If your marriage/relationship has no trust, then there could be concern for who you or your spouse is communicating with. However, if you are honest with each other, there is no reason for alarm for @replying to someone or starting up conversations. I think it is far more innocent than meeting at a restaurant with a random opposite sex twitter friend for tea/coffee. That takes things to a whole new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Zac Cross</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3236</guid>
		<description>I think your @replies are more open and public and therefore innocent. I think DMs can be innocent as well, and even facebook messages vs facebook wall posts are along those same lines. However, something like Tiger Text or whatever that is, nothing good can come from that. Even facebook chat can go both directions. It comes down to trust. If your marriage/relationship has no trust, then there could be concern for who you or your spouse is communicating with. However, if you are honest with each other, there is no reason for alarm for @replying to someone or starting up conversations. I think it is far more innocent than meeting at a restaurant with a random opposite sex twitter friend for tea/coffee. That takes things to a whole new level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your @replies are more open and public and therefore innocent. I think DMs can be innocent as well, and even facebook messages vs facebook wall posts are along those same lines. However, something like Tiger Text or whatever that is, nothing good can come from that. Even facebook chat can go both directions. It comes down to trust. If your marriage/relationship has no trust, then there could be concern for who you or your spouse is communicating with. However, if you are honest with each other, there is no reason for alarm for @replying to someone or starting up conversations. I think it is far more innocent than meeting at a restaurant with a random opposite sex twitter friend for tea/coffee. That takes things to a whole new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating with Twitter by Zac Cross</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/cheating-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsaboutnothing.com/?p=3719#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>I think your @replies are more open and public and therefore innocent. I think DMs can be innocent as well, and even facebook messages vs facebook wall posts are along those same lines. However, something like Tiger Text or whatever that is, nothing good can come from that. Even facebook chat can go both directions. It comes down to trust. If your marriage/relationship has no trust, then there could be concern for who you or your spouse is communicating with. However, if you are honest with each other, there is no reason for alarm for @replying to someone or starting up conversations. I think it is far more innocent than meeting at a restaurant with a random opposite sex twitter friend for tea/coffee. That takes things to a whole new level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your @replies are more open and public and therefore innocent. I think DMs can be innocent as well, and even facebook messages vs facebook wall posts are along those same lines. However, something like Tiger Text or whatever that is, nothing good can come from that. Even facebook chat can go both directions. It comes down to trust. If your marriage/relationship has no trust, then there could be concern for who you or your spouse is communicating with. However, if you are honest with each other, there is no reason for alarm for @replying to someone or starting up conversations. I think it is far more innocent than meeting at a restaurant with a random opposite sex twitter friend for tea/coffee. That takes things to a whole new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: agaacqmggm.c03.gridserver.com @ 2010-03-12 02:58:51 by W3 Total Cache -->